Deadeye @ 20:39 pm

I tried to get my daughter to take Chinese in college.  Thought it would be far better in the future world than the French she had selected.  Of course, she took French and is currently attending her final semester of college in Paris.   If kids would only listen to their parents!  :-)

Thought this might be of interest.

Liquidity Won’t Help Insolvency

The Federal Reserve today announced a new scheme to inject more liquidity into the money markets. It cobbled together a partnership arrangement, as the Canadian, UK and European central banks also agreed to participate in the scheme.

The process of ‘injecting liquidity’ is a euphemistic way of saying ‘creating money out of thin air.’ The Federal Reserve doesn’t need a printing press to do this. They simply create a book entry on its balance sheet, and presto, $40 billion (or whatever amount they deem appropriate) of new ‘money’ is created, which the Fed then lends to those bankers coming to it hat in hand.

Creating money this way is a barbaric process because it further debases the dollar, but is hailed by the banking insiders and their apologists as a brilliant maneuver to fight the worsening liquidity crunch. Of course it is a view of those with vested interests, and bluntly, is just their selling pitch to the masses. It is a view so horribly misguided these insiders obviously realize it is wrong. They must know that the problem impacting banks today is insolvency, not liquidity.

Years of reckless credit expansion are coming home to roost. The boom is over, and since this past summer we have been in the bust, which is worsening day-by-day.  Solvency is a problem of asset quality, not access to sources of funding. For example, Citibank didn’t have any trouble raising $7 billion of funding from a sovereign wealth fund at the right price, which was 11% – a rate far above the rates Citibank is paying to its depositors.  This 11% rate reflects the risk of dollar inflation and the risk that Citibank has a lot of bad loans and other inferior assets on its balance sheet that will never be repaid.

There are gaping ‘black holes’ on the asset side of bank balance sheets. These black holes cannot be filled by creating money out of thin air. These black holes were created by assets that have ‘disappeared’. In other words, bank balance sheets are loaded with assets that are not worth what they once were, or in the worst possible case, no longer have any value at all. The bank liabilities remain, but their assets have been reduced.  If this gap is larger than bank capital, then bank solvency is called into question, and that is the process now being evaluated by the markets.

Even though they have already announced countless billions of write-offs, banks have a long way to go in toting up their total losses. They face a daunting task. Many – but in reality, probably most – of their assets are impossible to value.

Sub-prime paper no longer has a functioning market to provide even a nominal market price for these assets. As economic activity slows and unemployment rises, people who the banks now believe to be good borrowers will increasingly default on their loan obligations. For example, The Wall Street Journal reported on December 6th: “First came housing loans and the subprime-mortgage crisis. Now, signs of stress are creeping into another key consumer area: auto loans. Delinquencies in the auto-loan market are ticking up to their highest level in several years.”

The economic boom-to-bust cycle caused by bank lending and their subsequent credit contraction is not rocket science, nor a startling revelation. The last banking bust occurred in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Before that, a much deeper bust occurred in 1973-1974, and it more closely mirrors the severity of the way the present bust is developing. Here’s how Ludwig von Mises described the process nearly one-hundred years ago, making clear the inevitable destruction of fiat currency from inflation.

 ”The course of a progressing inflation is this: At the beginning the inflow of additional money makes the prices of some commodities and services rise; other prices rise later. The price rise affects the various commodities and services … at different dates and to a different extent. This first stage of the inflationary process may last for many years. While it lasts, the prices of many goods and services are not yet adjusted to the altered money relation. There are still people … who have not yet become aware of the fact that they are confronted with a price revolution which will finally result in a considerable rise of all prices. These people still believe that prices one day will drop. Waiting for this day, they restrict their purchases and … increase their cash holdings.

But then finally the masses wake up. They become suddenly aware of the fact that inflation is a deliberate policy and will go on endlessly. The crack-up boom appears. Everybody is anxious to swap his money against “real” goods, no matter whether he needs them or not, no matter how much money he has to pay for them. Within a very short time … the things which were used as money are no longer used as media of exchange. They become scrap paper.”

And scrap bank accounts. While paper was the predominant form of currency in Mises time, today bank deposits moved around by check, plastic cards and wire transfer are a much more significant form of currency than paper.

Given this new market intervention scheme announced today by the Federal Reserve, it is reasonable to ask, where else are central banks intervening today? It seems clear that they are capping gold, and I would not be surprised to learn about huge central bank sales taking place today when they get around to reporting it a few weeks from now.  With new dollars being created with abandon, crude oil climbing back above $92 and the Commodity Research Bureau Index climbing to another record high, why is gold so quiet?

GATA knows the answer, and so does everyone else who has been following GATA’s work, which is available free at the GATA website, www.gata.org In another barbarous market intervention, central banks are obviously capping the gold price, but that creates a wonderful opportunity to buy more gold bullion and get rid of overvalued dollars, dollars that continue to be debased and inflated. Gold is much lower today than it would be if central banks weren’t capping its price. So use this opportunity to continue accumulating physical gold bullion.

*****

James Turk is the founder of GoldMoney (www.goldmoney.com) and the co-author of The Coming Collapse of the Dollar (www.dollarcollapse.com).

Copyright © 2007 by James Turk.  All rights reserved.

 

This really reminds me of the latter 60’s when we went off the gold standard .

It is basically setting up to be the same type of inflation, stagnation and a run on gold/silver, hard assets. Oil will be higher than I really want to think about. And people will not be as “polite” as they were in the 70’s.

This is setting up to be a real fiasco in the upcoming years. Those that are nimble enough to play the moves are going to make a ton of money.

Just my humble opinion, and my 2 cents worth. (Next year probably a penny’s worth)

 

ferret @ 20:18 pm

I’m really surprised that Australia beat us to the punch on this!   But then maybe we just have not heard of Santa’s being instructed to not use Ho-Ho-Ho here in the US.  Amazing stuff going on these days.   Have a good weekend!

I would love to have some Chinese posting here -

to give us some first hand impressions of what is really going on there and their view of Gold? Jimmy Roger’s view on CNBC is a little restricted. Deadeye

North, well, I guess that’s too bad. Here’s another example of Aussies being offensive:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071115/wl_asia_afp/lifestyleaustraliachristmasoffbeat

Some Yanks need to get a life!

ferret

That’s strange. In the Encarta dictionary it says that it is an offensive term used to refer to a Chinese person. So if that is “what you always say” you must be offending a lot of people, even if you don’t think it is offensive. “Kiwi” on the other hand is not defined in the same dictionary as offensive.

by Gary Tanashian

RUN AWAY!

“If you are emotion driven, you see the bunny ripping off men’s heads. If you are using logic… well, you know.”

gold2.png

tinyurl.com/26pk7h

by Gary Tanashian
biiwii.com
December 14, 2007

~ ~ ~ ~

JBI

North, because that’s what we always do.

Pommies, Kiwis, Argies, Scandies, Chinkies.

 Australian expression of multiculturalism.  No offense intended.

T G I F

What else, but the usual TGIF toast to ALL!

What a week!

Cheers!

JBI

cheers1.jpg

PS - 12,111,350

Ferret 17:55

“However, the Chinkies have already indicated that they are unhappy with some of the attitudes of Australia’s mining industry…”

Should this be acceptable on this international, multicultural forum?. Why not just say “the Chinese”?

For Ment

It’s the real thing…

burmashave.jpg

soee @ 18:55 pm

appears that you had a nice day in Amazon!  :-)

auric….ouch

that retail chart is brutal.

i may be hurting after the last couple days but i’ll take gold over that any day of the week.

Peter Schiff

listening to his internet show last nite. Although he doesnt recommend it to his clients, because they are mostly trying to protect their portfolios, he said that his own personal portfolio contains 50% precious metal stocks.

ferret @ 17:42

No I didn’t realize that wanka wanka meant that; I’m sure he’ll be pleased to hear that.  cheers…