FGC - a matter of policy
Your post of the bit from Murphy’s site suggests that there is mystery afoot. However, for over 30 years this has been studied and discussed. The CB policy question of whether to repress the price of gold and thereby retain deep storage inventory for a later date is, for example, addressed in detail here
http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/1997/582/ifdp582.pdf
Note the curious terminology using the word ‘welfare’. The specifics of this process are addressed in fairly voluminous literature, for example
http://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/econom/v60y1993i237p1-11.html
which describes how monopolistic control of a non-renewable resource can be lost. Antal Fekete has posted at Midas the process by which the fed avoids tax liability including funding economic studies. By parceling these studies out they are capable of utilizing public institutions to do the studies supporting these projects and piece the results together into policy. This is a simple factual matter and following the links in these articles and searching related topics will add more info.
This may well be the visable manifestations of the info presented at deepblacklies, a link to which was posted at the Tent a few nights ago.
Be careful. Maybe this is ’it’, but we hope we’re not it - this game is for keeps.