Bill,
It seems to me that the issue of how long the gold suppression scheme can last may ultimately be related to how long the fiat money system itself can continue — and vice versa. Intelligent observers and high-ranking government officials (note that these are two distinct categories) understand that the current financial system is teetering on the edge of an abyss. If the dollar-based system of international payments falters, then the entire global economic system will freeze up and contract, as there will be no universally accepted medium of exchange; or at least not one that the ruling class wants to consider.
Given the circumstances, it is not bizarre to expect this to happen in the near future. I cannot help but think, though, that there are some powerful dynamics that will stretch out the process.
The first factor is that the central banks and governments of this planet are all shackled with huge quantities of reserves called dollars. The financial power of the governments is rooted in these reserves. They provide stability, wealth, favors, the option to intervene in markets and industry, etc. If the US Dollar blows away, then so does the legitimacy of the world’s currencies. So, as long as this situation persists, the banks are going to be Dollar supportive.
Second on the list is that while the Dollar system endures, central banks have proven themselves adept at preventing the financial system from completely freezing up. From bankrupt Japanese banks to blown-up hedge funds to British bank runs, the fiat system has kept the doors open and the wheels turning by spewing out more and more credit—even though this credit is destined to eventually decay into worthlessness. Still, as long as the public accepts unbacked paper bills as “money”, the process can continue (which, by the way, is the reason that the government took the tiny silver-backed Liberty Dollar challenge so seriously).
Third, while American corporations have spent the last 2 _ decades exporting their factories and productive capacity abroad, their customers have not moved. That means the countries in which those new factories were built must choose between accepting Dollars for payment, or by shutting their factory doors. If governments choose to shut the doors by rejecting the US Dollar as a form of payment, their newly emerged middle class will be sent hurtling back into poverty; something that will cause riots and very probably regime changes.
It should come as no surprise, then, that no one has chosen to shut any factories. Instead, they are piling up Dollar surpluses, which they are now trying to dump on someone else through “Sovereign Wealth Funds.” A “Sovereign Wealth Fund” is a fancy name for a “What the Heck Do I Do with All These Blankety-Blank Greenbacks?” Fund. The obvious answer is; you spend them before they become worthless. This is a major reason why the fiat system will continually lose value, but not be allowed to fail; the Sovereign Wealth Funds haven’t spent their money, yet.
The current situation reminds me of the start of a grand game of Monopoly in which all the properties are still for sale. In this Monopoly game the properties are the assets of the issuer of US Dollars, the USA. Choice properties include railroads and public works (for example, freeways that will soon become tollways), natural resource companies, utilities, corporations that actually produce something (financial services companies need not apply) and all holders of valuable tangible goods. As long as there are desirable properties left on the board, the players will be loath to see the game end; they prefer to remain at the table and support the Dollar reserve system.
How does one support the Dollar system? One way is to support the suppression of the price of gold, since gold is the most visible symbol of fiat money’s weakness. That means that central banks will be under pressure to sell more gold than they would otherwise. That also means using up all of the “easy” options to sell gold—like the IMF’s hoard.
(A tangent to the discussion of the proposed IMF sale is that I don’t believe it can be conducted like an earlier IMF sale, where gold was just transferred from one official entity to another. That would do nothing to tamp down the market price of the yellow metal, which is what the CB’s need. With gold production falling steeply, the governments need a sale along the lines of Gordon Brown’s—where gold was sold directly onto the open market. The sellers are in for a surprise, though; the gold market is a lot more active and deeper now than it was when the English dumped their reserves. If the U.S. Congress ever approves the sale, the IMF gold is likely to quickly be absorbed and one of the gold market’s last supply overhangs will be eliminated.)
So it looks to me like the prospects for an immediate crash are not high—or at least there are a lot of motivated governments that don’t want to see that happen, yet. Instead we will likely get a sequence of financial crises as clusters of stupidity and cupidity surface and are acknowledged. Each episode will, in its turn, be responded to with the emollient of a new flood of paper money and credit. Each trauma will further hollow out the system. A failure at any time to keep gold in sufficient supply will lead to a cataclysm and thus, every trick in the book will be used to convince market participants that enough gold is still available—fraud being near the top of the list. Even so, this activity will only slow the gold market’s ascent, not stop it, until the day the comes that gold suddenly rockets out of the atmosphere into a realm where dollars are no longer used as a measure of the yellow metal’s price.
Best wishes,
Peter R.
www.pandacollector.com