By now, everyone following the markets knows the major news of the day (and yesterday):
JP Morgan Closes Deal on Bear Stearns
Associated Press
Sunday, March 16, 2008
NEW YORK — JPMorgan Chase said Sunday it will acquire rival Bear Stearns in a deal valued at $236.2 million, a stunning collapse for one of the world’s largest and most venerable investment banks.
JPMorgan Chase & Co. said the $2 a share, all-stock deal has received the required approvals from the federal government and the Federal Reserve. Bear Stearns shares closed Friday at $30 a share.
news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080316/ap_on_bi_ge/jpmorgan_bear_stearns
-END-
In my last Midas I opined that Bear CEO Alan Schwartz was a liar re the true condition of his firm. Bear closed Friday around $30. He lied in an attempt to shore up confidence, the name of the game on Wall Street, as his firm and net worth was imploding:
*Schwarz owned 1,026,680 of Bear shares as of 21-Dec-07
*But managed to sell enough shares last quarter to rake in the following…
21-Dec-07 SCHWARTZ ALAN D
Officer 161,662 Direct Option Exercise at $0 per share. N/A 21-Dec-07
Officer 67,900 Direct Sale at $89.01 per share. $6,043,779
Midas has made much over the years how JP Morgan is the Fed’s bank and was instrumental in The Gold Cartel’s implementation of the gold price suppression scheme. That closeness was revealed in the Bear deal, which is evident to me for two specific reasons:
*The $30 billion backstop by the Fed of the mortgage paper purchased by Morgan.
*Morgan’s share price was up $2 this morning. How many times have you ever seen the share price of an acquirer go UP around 10% on an announcement like this? … Not too many.
Surprisingly, there was a fair amount of comment yesterday and today about the “Moral Hazard” created by these constant bailouts. Naturally, the importance of such was trivialized in this case, as it is in all the other specific cases. This Moral Hazard concept has caught a good deal of traction, but only as a GENERAL concept. Meanwhile, little has changed … once again the powers in New York and Washington have sacrificed the future to save their own bacon.
Financial markets were in chaos this morning. All the Asian stock markets were lower, with the Nikkei off 454 to 11,787. During the Asian trading hours gold roared to $1032 and silver soared to $21.34. However, par for the course, as we came in to the New York trading hours, the markets began to miraculously stabilize… that is if you believe in the Tooth Fairy. Commodities such as gold, silver, oil, cotton, and copper were trashed … the dollar began to rally … and the DOW quickly erased early losses to go positive. Well, what do you know … “Everything is fine” again in Stepfordville.
None of this predictable market action was a surprise to most of us who live on Planet GATA. It was all telegraphed in advance…
Bush to meet with U.S. financial policymakers
Sat Mar 15, 2008 2:01pm EDT
President George W. Bush plans to meet on Monday with top U.S. financial policymakers, the White House said, at a time of increased strains in credit markets and fears of a recession.
The White House said on Saturday Bush will meet members of the President’s Working Group on Financial Markets, and a spokeswoman said Bush will get a status report on the markets….
The working group is led by U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and also includes Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke as well as the heads of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
www.reuters.com/article/vcCandidateFeed1/idUSN1545788520080315?sp=true
-END-
Can ANYONE tell me what the head of the SEC and CFTC can do to calm markets, or give them “confidence?” The only thing I can think of is that the SEC and CFTC make sure the PPT and Gold Cartel are able to operate with impunity.
Paulson Says He’ll `Do What It Takes’ to Calm Markets
March 16 (Bloomberg) — Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said the U.S. will “do what it takes’ to maintain confidence in financial markets and defended the bailout of Bear Stearns Cos. as “the right decision.’
“There’s always a decision to be made to say what’s best for the stability of the marketplace, the orderliness of the marketplace,’ Paulson said in an interview in Washington on the “Fox News Sunday’ television program.
“I think we made the right decision.’
www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aFBRN.LrEcMA&refer=home
-END-
Operative phrase from General “Mr. Market Manipulation” Paulson: “Do what it takes.”
Something has been bugging me for a long time … and it has to do with a nagging feeling I have come across Hank Paulson, the US Secretary of the Treasury, some place in my past. I let it go until last night when I did a Google on him…
What a hoot … Hank Paulson was born on March 28, 1946, two days later than me, which makes us both Aries. We both went to Ivy League schools … myself at Cornell, Paulson to Dartmouth. We both played college football … myself as a wide receiver, Paulson as a lineman … and against each other for 3 years. We both were All Ivy, All East and Honorable mention All American.
That is where the comparison stops. Paulson was Phi Beta Kappa. I made peanut brittle at the School of Hotel and Restaurant Administration. He is Secretary of the Treasury and I am Chairman of GATA, which is challenging his nefarious market rigging drills.
The Cornell/Dartmouth connection/game was always a big deal for me since I was a youngster, as my Dad caught the famous 5th Down pass for Cornell against Dartmouth in 1939, when they were ranked as the number 1 or 2 team in the nation. As many vet Café members know, my dad caught a TD pass to give Cornell the win on the last play of the game. However, the films showed Cornell was given an unwarranted 5th down by Referee Red Friesel. In the only time in collegiate history, Cornell awarded the game to Dartmouth on the following Monday. It had to do with sportsmanship.
Back to Bear Stearns for a bit and something that I intend to touch on in GATA’s Washington conference … and it takes us back to this Moral Hazard investment issue. While my analysis is simplistic, I believe the gold price suppression scheme was THE lynchpin for the financial market, mortgage related excesses and nightmare economic problems of the day. Had gold been allowed to trade freely the past decade, the price would be double what it is today (this would only have put it at its inflation adjusted all-time high price, like so many other commodities). Based on a historical relationship between gold and US interest rates, our interest rates would have been much higher than they were and have been. These higher rates, or more expensive money, would have slowed down the deluge into the mortgage related arena … much of the surge based on the low cost of money in the US. A rising, freely traded gold price (a barometer of US financial health well being) would have sent warning signals that something was amiss … something which needed to be addressed by more prudent investment behavior. Instead, that barometer was disabled, until recently.