Turnpike deal has feel of a shell game Ron Bartizek Business Local
Is the deal to lease the Pennsylvania Turnpike for 75 years to a consortium that includes Citigroup and a Spanish company good for the state and the drivers who will pay higher tolls? It could be, but it’s also a sign that the kind of short-term thinking that gets Wall Street in trouble has seeped into the Capitol.
In a sense, what Gov. Ed Rendell wants to do is similar to a business selling its headquarters building, then leasing it back. In that case, the idea is to cash in a one-time windfall in the hope that reinvesting the proceeds will add more value than the expected appreciation in the real estate. Often, though, asset sales are a sign that operating performance is inadequate and management can’t figure out how to improve it.
In this one, the state gets the full lease payment of $12.8 billion up front, with its optimistically projected $1.1 billion annual investment earnings dedicated to highway and bridge repairs.
The governor says the state is not selling assets, just leasing the turnpike to a private operator who can operate it more efficiently, then return it in original condition. But with a 75-year term, the proposed lease lasts longer than most businesses’ lifetimes and certainly well beyond a politician’s tenure.
This move has the feel of yet another gimmick that extracts taxes from only a portion of the citizenry, rather than a broad-based revenue stream in which we all participate. Recently approved casino gambling is another example, but at least in that case the people paying the freight are doing so intentionally.
Truckers and commuters for whom the turnpike is the best route don’t have so much choice. The Pennsylvania Motor Truck Association recently came out in favor of increased taxes on motor fuels rather than higher tolls to fund desperately needed maintenance. Not only would that be more equitable, the association argued, it would eliminate an incentive for truckers to use narrow secondary roads such as state Route 118, the site of a recent fatal crash, to avoid paying tolls. The proposed turnpike lease allows a 25 percent hike in tolls the first year, followed by smaller annual increases.
Perhaps even more than shortsighted economics, the leasing scheme symbolizes political timidity, as elected officials choose what appears to be the least stressful alternative to others that could provide needed funding. Reforming the incredibly wasteful Turnpike Commission and modestly hiking the gas tax come to mind, but both would be politically difficult, but more responsible.
There’s another political risk; that a future governor and legislators will hijack the proceeds – or even some of the principal – for unintended uses or simply to plug budget gaps. That’s already happening with gambling proceeds, with a proposal to swing $750 million that was supposed to go for property tax relief into water and sewer work.
Structured properly, a turnpike lease may be able to avoid potential pitfalls. The least that needs to happen now is for the deal to undergo a thorough, third-party review as well as vetting by the Legislature, whose members hopefully can view it in the narrow way Rendell envisions, rather than as a piggy bank ripe for raiding.
Rendell deserves credit for forcing action on this important issue and his instincts about what will gain approval may be right on target. But shell games like this can’t go on indefinitely. Sooner or later we’ll have to accept and pay for realistic solutions to real problems.
(If it walks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck - IT’s A DUCK!) JMO