I am beginning to put my thoughts together for my debate with Tim Wood in Las Vegas in two weeks. Those who are leery of what GATA has to say, usually ask for immediate proof, to be answered in a quick sound bite, or ask for an admission (quote) by General Paulson that the US manages the price of gold. Although, I swear, even that would not do for some of the skeptics. You know the ole line, “There are none so blind as those who will not see.”
To really comprehend the manipulation, and the extent of the managing, you need to look at the big picture and the collective bits of evidence of the price suppression scheme. In the United States someone can be put to death in a capital crime case, like pre-meditated murder, if the circumstantial evidence is so overwhelmingly compelling that a jury can come to no other conclusion than guilty behind a reasonable doubt.
Sure, GATA has its smoking guns, a number of them, but it is the massive amount of indicting evidence, accumulated for 9 ½ years which proves our case. The trick in the debate will be presenting the most egregious examples of the manipulation and tying them together in a short period of time.
For example, and only the TIP of the iceberg … The US reports to have 8,133.5 tonnes of gold reserves. Since arriving at that amount MANY years ago, the US Fed and Treasury say none of it has been mobilized (sold, leased or swapped). Then why…
*Did the Fed redact hundreds of pages sent to GATA following our FOIA request regarding US gold swamps … and refuse to send hundreds of other pages? If the gold is just sitting there, what is there to hold back?
*Did the US Treasury respond to possible Exchange Stabilization Fund activity with a response to GATA referring to the “Exchange Stability Fund”? Huh? Are they that lame? Years earlier the Fed’s attorney, Virgil Mattingly, said the Fed Minutes were “garbled” when asked about the meaning of the term gold swaps by Kentucky Senator Jim Bunning? Can’t these people walk and chew gum at the same time.
*Did the US Treasury change the classification of US gold reserves so many times? … After the GATA camp publicized The Treasury Department changed the designation of nearly 1,700 tonnes of inventoried gold at the U.S. Mint’s facility in West Point, N.Y., which is approximately 21 percent of the total U.S. gold reserve, from ‘Gold Bullion Reserve’ to ‘Custodial Gold.’
Now what does Custodial Gold mean to you? This is what it meant to James Turk:
“This description provides clear evidence that the US Gold Reserve is in play. Gold has been removed from US Treasury vaults and placed on deposit, presumably in the couple of bullion banks the Treasury has selected to assist with its gold price capping efforts.
Gold placed on deposit gets loaned out by these bullion banks, and then sold into the spot market to try capping the gold price. The same thing happens with swaps, but the vague language in the note to the Treasury reports makes it uncertain whether they are in fact being used at the moment.”
After GATA raised a stink about the name reclassification, etc., the Treasury reclassified all US Gold Reserves as ‘Deep Storage Gold’. Now what does Deep Storage mean to you?
Now here is where it gets even juicier. Two years ago the IMF asked all of its member banks to adequately report their true gold reserve status … meaning tell the truth about what gold is in the vaults and what gold is not there via swaps and gold leasing operations.
Last May the US Treasury went half way in that regard. James Turk reported on what they did:
“Note the additional description of gold provided in the new reporting format. It says the US Gold Reserve is 261.499 million ounces and importantly, that the gold is now reported “including gold deposits and, if appropriate, gold swapped.”
“This description provides clear evidence that the US Gold Reserve is in play. Gold has been removed from US Treasury vaults and placed on deposit, presumably in the couple of bullion banks the Treasury has selected to assist with its gold price capping efforts.”
Now why did the Treasury even bother to change the nomenclature of US gold reserves if it is all just sitting there like they claim?
The Fed and Treasury refuse to answer to the whys of any of this. Maybe Tim Wood will able to furnish some reasoned answers.
Meanwhile, the IMF has gone silent about its request to its member banks about accurately reporting their gold reserves.
Gold demand input from a Café member, which corroborates the info we are receiving in Gold Goodies…
“Just a note, a close source has told me Gold Vault at a major London bank has been shipping a lot of Gold to Turkey, with a comment from the person who said some of it might be headed for Iran? But, he said the amount of Gold being shipped out is unusually high.”
Adrian on…
The US Mint Gold Shortage
Bill,
I have been thinking further about the shortage of gold blanks for the Eagle program. We know that the US Government used up its last vestiges of silver from the Strategic Silver stockpile a few years ago and are now forced to buy silver on the market so the shortage of silver for silver Eagles that came to light earlier this year revealed there is a shortage of silver in the market. On the gold side the Mint is supposed to have “working stock” of gold of approx 2.7 million ozs. In theory even if gold is in short supply in the market they should be supplying their gold to some blank manufacturer for them to convert it into blanks. While the US Mint has gold there should be no shortage of blanks. So this begs the question about what is the true status of the US Mint gold and by implication the US Treasury gold. We know from James Turk’s work that Treasury gold is being used in swap operations, we also know that something fishy has been going on with the US Mint gold because they reclassified their gold from “custodial” to “deep storage” and “working stock”. One has to wonder why there are no blanks if the US Mint has the gold…which leads me to the possibility that they don’t. Or if they do they don’t want to part with it anymore in unlimited quantities.
Cheers
Adrian