equisetum
i decided many years ago that my family could starve before i would continue to practice accounting. (the fact that they nearly did is beyond the scope of this posting)
the reasons are many why accountants can’t find problems with public companies. we can start with who pays the fees. you guessed it, the very same company they are reviewing.
now to the description of the audit. “we have examined the income statement, balance sheet and other pertinent data.” no mention of “off balance sheet liabilities” because they aren’t mentioned in the financial statements. it’s only when the cash flow is insufficient to cover these “secret” liabilities do they see the light of day. that’s usually the same day the rumors start.
then we get to the exotic stuff. how do you measure counter party risk? you can’t even find out who the other party is in many cases. you may have hedged the risk of a bad or weak customer and when it’s time to collect on the hedge, you find out it’s non other than aig. do you value all assets at cost or market? what if you can’t get a clue what market value is.
as a former accountant, my main consideration is “would i invest in or do business with this company (these people) on a handshake basis? are they competent and caring or are just worried about the next round of bonuses? do they even recognize they have investors or customers?
imho, most audits are virtually worthless. every public traded company must have an “independent” annual audit (sec regs) i guess fannie and freddy don’t count. i truly hope things are better in canada but i fear not. englands’ influence over accounting has been around since they were the sole super power. the u.s., canada, and australia have nearly the exact accounting rules as england. india and china have many similarities.
annual reports are obsolete before they are printed. management must now make decisions on a regular basis that are life and death of the company. one slip and it’s all over. i just don’t feel competent that the “good old boy network” can produce competent management in the current environment. i’m sure this is way more than you wanted on the subject. my advice is to go with the ta, fa is usually outdated by the time we find out about it.
rno

