Even the NY Times ‘gets it’: The Federal Reserve and the Treasury announced $800 billion in new lending programs on Tuesday, sending a message that they would print as much money as needed to revive the nation’s crippled banking system.
www.nytimes.com/2008/11/26/business/economy/26fed.html?_r=1&th&emc=th
Bloomberg: Fed Risks ‘Spitting in the Wind’ With New $800 Billion Pledge
The Federal Reserve’s new $800 billion effort to combat the financial crisis is designed to make credit more accessible to shaken consumers who aren’t sure they want more debt. Households and lenders may not respond much because of the wealth destruction from plunging property and stock values, and the deepening economic slump, economists say. That means banks may end up returning the Fed’s new liquidity through deposits at the central bank.
“We are sort of spitting in the wind,” said Michael Darda, chief economist at MKM Partners LP in Greenwich, Connecticut. “Banks won’t be throwing a lot of loans out there when they fear — rationally– those loans may not be paid back.”…
The Fed responded yesterday, invoking authority first granted in 1966 to buy $500 billion of
mortgage-backed securities issued by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae.
www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068
&sid=ag3TJyGD73qk&refer=home
We have noted numerous times that despite Wall Street and monetarist lore, the Fed did NOT tighten credit after the 1929 Crash and in fact pumped furiously until Q3 1931. At that time global gold runs and US statutes prevented the Fed from creating more credit – until Q2 1932. Interest rates only increased modestly over those two quarters…Additionally, the NY Fed, which at the time acted independently of the Fed, also pumped furiously.
When you confront those that try to blame the Fed for causing the Great Depression by contracting the money supply with the truth, the academicians’ retort is: “They could’ve monetized long bonds.”
Back then the US government had little long-term debt, so that excuse is lame. Now however, Great Depression ‘expert’, Ben Bernanke, is monetizing long bonds via his GSE and mortgage bond buying.
If recent measures, schemes and nationalizations fail, the Fed will have destroyed itself. But it is bigger than that. US solons have bet the ranch – the Treasury, the dollar, US bond market, the political system and economy - on hyper-credit and nationalization.
The FT: Merkel criticizes US over crisis Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, turned the tables on her international critics on Wednesday by accusing the US and other governments of making “cheap money” a central tool of their economic management, thus planting the seeds of a similar crisis in five years. “Excessively cheap money in the US was a driver of today’s crisis,” she told the German parliament. “I am deeply concerned about whether we are now reinforcing this trend through measures being adopted in the US and elsewhere and whether we could find ourselves in five yearsmfacing the exact same crisis.”
www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e361d344-bc0c-11dd-80e9-0000779fd18c.html
Merkel is right and wrong. The US’ reckless monetary policy and widespread nationalizations will create a bigger problem later but it probably won’t take five years to appear and the crises will be different.
2
Recent history validates Merkle’s prophesy. After the bursting of the Great US Stock Bubble and 9/11, Easy Al and US solons feared a depression. So Easy Al drafted Great Depression academician, Ben Bernanke, and the Fed embarked on the reckless monetary policy and lax regulation that produced the housing bubble and the ensuing destruction of the US financial system.
Now, Easy Al’s mind-addling credit creation looks like a temperance movement compared to Ben. PS –
We’ve heard numerous reports that Easy Al is telling anyone that will listen to him that the mess isn’t his fault – he was just listening to Ben. So you might see this published by an Easy Al-friendly reporter soon. Ambrose Evans-Pritchard: Citigroup says gold could rise above $2,000 next year as world unravels Gold is poised for a dramatic surge and could blast through $2,000 an ounce by the end of next year as central banks flood the world’s monetary system with liquidity, according to an internal client note from the US bank Citigroup.
The bank said the damage caused by the financial excesses of the last quarter century was forcing the world’s authorities to take steps that had never been tried before. This gamble was likely to end in one of two extreme ways: with either a resurgence of inflation; or a downward spiral into depression, civil disorder, and possibly wars. Both outcomes will cause a rush for gold. “They are throwing the kitchen sink at this,” said Tom Fitzpatrick, the bank’s chief technical strategist…
“The world is not going back to normal after the magnitude of what they have done. When the
dust settles this will either work, and the money they have pushed into the system will feed though into an inflation shock. “Or it will not work because too much damage has already been done, and we will see continued financial deterioration, causing further economic deterioration, with the risk of a feedback loop.
www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans
_pritchard/3526645/Citigroup-says-goldcould-rise-above-
2000-next-year-as-world-unravels.html